Mental Practice

by Marcel
(Dublin, Ireland)

Question: I have a question regarding mentally practicing the piano. The last expert tip on the Efficient Piano Practice page suggests to study away from the piano. I have heard that a number of great pianists such as Glenn Gould and Walter Gieseking spent most of their practice time away from the piano and learned new pieces just by studying the score. What did they actually do when they practiced mentally? How did they manage to mentally learn a new piece so that they could play it on the piano straightaway?

Albert's reply: Walter Gieseking outlined his (actually his teacher's) method in detail in the 1932 book he coauthored with his teacher Karl Leimer, The Shortest Way to Pianistic Perfection. Briefly summarized, the method involves analyzing every piece in great detail, translating it into verbal sentences such as "The piece is in 6/8 meter, in C major. The right hand starts with a dotted quarter rest, then come three descending eighths in double thirds, starting on C-E two octaves above middle C. The second measure continues this descending pattern in the right hand, with G-B on the downbeat and D-F on beat two."





It's a very good idea to analyze all of your pieces in this manner since it transfers the locus of memory away from the fingers, thus both complementing and reinforcing kinesthetic (muscle) memory.

Very often I find that a confusing passage yields more easily to conscious analysis than it does to further repetition. Making conscious observations—and verbalizing them—often solves such problems because the problems arise from not completely understanding the passage. Simple observations expressed as short statements often solve the problem. An example might be, "The thumbs coincide the first time the motive is played, and the right hand index finger plays together with the left thumb the second time."

All of us rely on different types of memory, and since playing the piano is a psycho-physical act, one that involves repeated strengthening of nerve pathways to effect a patterned motor skill, we do need to rely most on muscle memory.

What's most important is that the different forms of memory reinforce one another to the point of synergy, collectively forming a greater whole. Mental practice helps to achieve this end by transferring mostly automatic (i.e., subconscious) movements to the realm of conscious association.

My only major criticism of the Leimer/Gieseking method is that nowhere in their book do they mention that the music should be heard in the mind. Their method is strictly analytical—it does not involve ear training.

It is greatly preferable to hear each voice in the music in your mind's ear, and indeed it is a necessity, the way a conductor needs to hear each instrument in his mind. You can verify that you're actually hearing each voice by singing the voices in turn (using solfège), then playing that voice on the piano to check your accuracy. Your aural memory will eventually guide your fingers, and every detail of the music's sound will form an integral part of your mental impressions of the piece.

It's also worth noting that Gieseking had a photographic memory and had little personal need for a formal, detailed method as outlined in his book.



Comments for
Mental Practice

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Jun 30, 2010
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
The aural component
by: Maggie

I think it makes perfect sense that the ear eventually guides the hands. In my mind I always thought that it was a part of the intellectualizing or "reading" the piece that was the guiding force, however now it makes more sense that the sound itself is just so much more efficient.

Jun 30, 2010
Rating
starstarstarstar
No aural training
by: Max

I'm wondering if the omission of "hearing music in the mind" was based on an assumption by the author(s). It could be that the emphasis of analyzing the music gave way to strong implications that the student would naturally need to hear the music as he studies. Given the pedagogical nature of the text, it may have been overlooked because of that assumption.

Just a thought.

Jun 30, 2010
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Re: No aural training
by: Albert

Max, I think your assumption—that Leimer and Gieseking took hearing the music in the mind's ear for granted—is correct, and several times I nearly added that remark to this page. Gieseking was a superb musician in all respects and we can surely take for granted that he heard every note in his mind as he studied a score.

However, since the book is for students of only an intermediate level (and up), I think it's fair to call this more than a careless omission. The critical listening faculty simply doesn't factor into the Leimer/Gieseking method at all, to which their analyses in the book bear witness.

Hearing each note in the mind is really the single most fundamental aspect of learning any piece, and it is so ignored by most piano students that it needs explicit mention in any serious learning method. That said, combining the Leimer/Gieseking method with solfège makes for an immanently sound learning methodology. I happily recommend their book to all students, as long as they sing each voice accurately.

Jul 07, 2010
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Thank you
by: Marcel

Having read The Shortest Way to Pianistic Perfection myself, I found their method slightly too theoretical. However, with your answer in mind, I think I will give it a go. It indeed absolutely makes sense and seems like a logical and effective way of studying a piece.

Also, I found it particularly useful what you said about verbalization. Not only does it help me to memorize and understand a piece better, but it also forces me think continuously—something that I know is crucially important in piano playing.

Thank you for your excellent answer!

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Piano Practice Questions